Skip Nav

Essay On Democracy

Good Essay Topics on Democracy

❶A precise definition of democracy might be had by consulting the OED. Features of the constitutional ruling in Scandinavia.

Writing services

Header$type=social_icons
Academic guides
Democracy Essay Examples

Nothing is denied to well directed labor, nothing is to be obtained with out. Recognize your identity and adhere to it. Recognize who you are and how much you are sincere to yourself. If you are student, no activity other than study values to you more. Study is the only activity, you should concern wit. Realize the importance of study and role of study in your life.

Realize that your primary and foremost duty is study. Realizing these facts enhances your interest in study. Be serious and particular about your study.

Have love in your your for study. Never ignore the ground reality that you are a student and you have to study. Come out of the illusion.

You are a student and you have to study, accept it and make study your habit. You have certain goals attached to your study. Study socializes you, gives you insight and broadens your vision.

You have to work hard. You have to become a productive person in future who can serve the mankind, his family and himself. Your future is purely based on your study. Your family has high hopes from as well as people of society have expectations from you. Your dreams are based on your study. To make your dreams come true you have to sacrifice even your sleep. Make up your mind that you have to work hard and achieve success at any cost.

Problems are same for all students. It depends on you, how nicely you handle problems. Never fear problems in the way of your study. Have strong determination to tackle problems. Never decide at first glance that it is difficult. Go ahead and see the improvement.

Try, try and try again to make up your deficiencies. Start again with stronger determination. You should not stop if you fail one time, start again.

Make stumbling blocks your stepping stones which raise you to success. Success lies in the ability to stand firm as a rock under all circumstances. Develop the sense of competition. For instance, consider the student in your class who stands first in class and who get higher grades than you. Has he two brain or four eyes? No, the only reason is that he is more interested in study than you are interested in study. You can get higher marks than him if you think how to make it possible.

It means possibility of anything depend on your thinking. If you think that you can do it, you can surely do it. Have confidence in yourself and work hard. Nothing can divert you from your purpose. Have one successful person as your ideal personality and think how did he become successful? Follow his the way which made him successful. Meet successful people and talk to them how they succeeded.

They give you inspiration. It enhances your interest in your study. You should have the desire to learn. Desire to learn enables you to sacrifice for study and manage time for study. It enables you to study anywhere, any time.

It creates a sense of responsibility in you about study, a sign of success. It puts you in sense of competition to learn more and more. It make you generate new ideas and techniques for study, how to study effectively, how to concentrate, how to manage time for study.

In short, it makes study your habit. With such study you can just pass the exam with low grades or sometime you even fail. Aim of study is to get distinction in exam with high grades, which is only possible if you have the love or thirst to learn.

And thanks for this as this is full of advices. The Blog is titled as for BA students but some Ph. Ds have also taken my essays as references in their research papers. Allah may bless you with more wisdom… Thank you so much for writing such a beautiful essay. All of your essays are great.

They really helped me in my exams. Thank you again dear. May God give you alot of happiness and success in your life. Historically, God and country have been the two banners under which the great masses could proudly stand; but, in a modern society, God and country mean less and less, while, at the same time, the goals and aspirations of various groups increase and diverge.

It maybe that democracy is, and, indeed, has always been, unworkable; but we must continue to hold the ideal high and see to it that its trappings are securely fixed in place as, well -- as a bulwark, such as it is, against tyrannical rule. The reality is that we are forever fixed with a oligarchy government of the few masquerading as a democracy. The purpose of the ruling few is to execute its constitutional functions, which, because democracy is unworkable, should be tightly circumscribed.

The ideal of democracy is to be promoted, as it has been, to the rulers and the ruled, as a sacred icon; never mind that it cannot be used to put a society into action, to pass laws, and never mind that it rarely will cast up honest and wise leaders; it is, in the final analysis, a system that will routinely and expensively rotate those in charge; a manner of bloodlessly changing the guard.

The roots of democracy and freedom for all "western" democracies are planted in the rich history of Britain beginning with the Magna Carta. Enough to point out that when Captain Christopher Jones and his officers, together with their crew and their passengers disembarked from the Mayflower , in December of , the pilgrims drew up a compact that provided for the government of the colony by the will of the majority.

Human rights , a subject I deal with elsewhere, came about only through deep and long struggles culminating in historical declarations such as the Magna Carta and the Petition of Right , "A man cannot be compelled to give evidence against himself" ; but it is only with English Bill of Rights in that we see any real progress in the evolution of law designed to protect the "rights" of the normal citizen.

With the defeat of James at the Battle of the Boyne , the claim of divine right or hereditary right independent of law was formally brought to an end. Ever since, an English monarch is "as much the creature of an act of parliament as the pettiest tax-gatherer in his realm.

Liberty Press, 3rd Ed. John Buchanan The Nobel Laureate in Economic Science in and Gordon Tullock in their work, The Calculus of Consent , have shown in an "irrefutable way that whenever a minority is well organized and determined to bribe as many voters as necessary in order to have a majority ready to pass a desired decision, the majority rule works much more in favour of such minorities than is commonly supposed.

The harsher climate of the northern counties was associated with a ruder, a sterner, and a sparser people. Peter Landry peteblu blupete. Box , Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. To render the selection less than wholly accidental, all those upon whom the lot falls are subjected, before taking up their duties, to a rigorous dokimasia , or character examination, conducted by the Council or the courts. The candidate must show Athenian parentage on both sides, freedom from physical defect and scandal, the pious honoring of his ancestors, the performance of his military assignments, and the full payment of his taxes; his whole life is on this occasion exposed to challenge by any citizen, and the prospect of such a scrutiny presumably frightens the most worthless from the sortition.

If he passes this test the archon swears an oath that he will properly perform the obligations of his office, and will dedicate to the gods a golden statue of life-size if he should accept presents or bribes. You choose a member indeed; but when you have chosen him, he is not a member of Bristol, but he is a member of parliament. Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.

The state includes the dead, the living, and the coming generations. Each of us has a right to cast a vote for an individual to represent us in the legislative assembly.

The elected person then goes off to represent all of his constituents, whether they voted for him or not, indeed, whether they have even voted. How is he to look at issues and how is he to vote assuming, for the moment, that he has a free vote in parliament.

Should he vote on the basis of what he perceives the majority of his constituents want, right or wrong; or, as Burke suggests, does he vote his own conscience, vote as a "better and more informed person" than his average constituent; or does he, as it seems our system obliges, just vote the party line.

Popular election, as thus practised, instead of a security against misgovernment, is but an additional wheel in its machinery. The problem, as is so clearly set forth by Mill, is quite aside from the further and separate problem "that issues at stake in political life are too many and too complicated and that very many of them [issues] are actually unknown both to the representatives and to the people represented.

It would not be enough to make a man competent to decide whether to amputate a leg, and it is not enough to qualify him to choose war or peace, to arm or not to arm, to intervene or to withdraw, to fight on or to negotiate.

When distant and unfamiliar and complex things are communicated to great masses of people, the truth suffers a considerable and often a radical distortion. The complex is made over into the simple, the hypothetical into the dogmatic, and the relative into an absolute. There is an inherent tendency in opinion to feed upon rumors excited by our own wishes and fears. We should never hope or aim to choose a bully, but the elective process will give no guarantee that the people will not end up with one.

Democracy, no matter its imperfections, is a way by which the people can bloodlessly turn out leaders; but, the democratic process will only work with the consent of the leaders. The best that can be expected of a constitutional democracy, the best that can be expected by any political system, is a process by which the people turn up a leader or leaders which are prepared to deal with both the bullies amongst us and those at our borders.

Hopefully, the leader or leaders, so turned up by the "democratic process," do not turn out to be a worst set of bullies then that which might exist in an ungoverned state.

If, in the "democratic process," an elected leader turns into a bully; well, then, one should not rely on democracy, except as a rallying cry, to turn him out. To turn out a powerful bully, great quantities of spilt blood are needed. The people have acquired power which they are incapable of exercising, and the governments they elect have lost powers which they must recover if they are to govern. What then are the true boundaries of the people's power?

They can elect the government. They can remove it. They can approve or disapprove its performance. But they cannot administer the government. They cannot themselves perform. They cannot normally initiate and propose the necessary legislation.

A mass cannot govern. Where mass opinion dominates the government, there is a morbid derangement of the true functions of power. The derangement brings about the enfeeblement, verging on paralysis, of the capacity to govern.

This breakdown in the constitutional order is the cause of the precipitate and catastrophic decline of Western society. It may, if it cannot be arrested and reversed, bring about the fall of the West. The notions of freedom and of democracy, we might reasonably conclude, rest on the same foundations. This is not the case for the concepts of government and freedom: The principal business of government is the taking of freedom away from people; it is how government achieves its ends.

When their views have pork-barrel appeal, they take them to legislatures through lobbying. When their views have dramatic appeal, they take them to the public through media campaigns. Groups promote their pet experts, the battle goes public, and quiet scientists and engineers are drowned in the clamor.

Some things seem to work well enough without any notice being taken by the public: In the media, as in human consciousness, one concern tends to drive out another. This is what makes conscious attention so scarce and precious. Our society needs to identify the facts of its situation more swiftly and reliably, with fewer distracting feuds in the media. This will free public debate for its proper task - judging procedures for finding facts, deciding what we want, and helping us choose a path toward a world worth living in.

If we deny it, identifying the people with the prevailing pluralities who vote in order to serve, as Bentham has it, "their pleasures and their security," where and what is the nation, and whose duty and business is it to defend the public interest? Bentham leaves us with the state as an arena in which factions contend for their immediate advantage in the struggle for survival and domination.

Without the invisible and transcendent community to bind them, why should they care for posterity? And why should posterity care about them, and about their treaties and their contracts, their commitments and their promises.

Yet without these engagements to the future, they could not live and work; without these engagements the fabric of society is unraveled and shredded. When one thinks it through, one is bound to come to the conclusion that it is pretty presumptuous to strike on a legislative course, not knowing the degree or type of impact which such a course will have on those generations which stretch out we hope much beyond that time which will mark the current generation's departure from this life.

The executive must be like a steel shirt of the Middle Ages - extremely hard and extremely flexible. It must give way to attractive novelties which do not hurt; For a free and democratic nation to work, a politician must, in the first place and right off the bat, in an honest fashion, convince the electorate that democracy is what they need, if they are to get what they want -- optimal human conditions for the medium term.

The reality of things, with no exceptions that I can think of, is that what people desire is the soft and the easy; what is needed is the hard and the difficult if only to achieve the soft and the easy. The pressure of the electorate is normally for the soft side of the equations. That is why governments are unable to cope with reality when elected assemblies and mass opinions become decisive in the state, when there are no statesmen to resist the inclination of the voters and there are only politicians to excite and exploit them.

There is then a general tendency to be drawn downward, as by the force of gravity, towards insolvency, towards the insecurity of factionalism, towards the erosion of liberty, and towards hyperbolic wars. Much is asked of democracy:

Header$type=menu

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Our previous "essay" feature from March , on democracy. Argentina’s debt saga. Argentina has defaulted again. But a deal with its creditors is not out of the question.

Privacy FAQs

Democracy is a tender topic for a writer: like motherhood and apple pie it is not to be criticized. One will risk being roundly condemned if he, or she, points out the serious bottleneck that is presented when a community attempts, through the democratic process, to set plans for positive social action.

About Our Ads

- Democracy is a unique type of government, and the purpose of this essay is to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses that a democratic government provides. I will detail that many components of this type of society are both strengths and weakness as each component has beneficial aspects as well as unavoidable pitfalls. Democracy essays Democracy is almost everywhere in the world. Europe has used its form of government for almost half a century. North and South America are now virtually a hemisphere of democracy; Africa is experiencing democratic reform; and .

Cookie Info

Struggling with essay writing on democracy? How about to browse this professionally written essay example on this topic and use it at your convenience. ( WORDS) INTRODUCTION THE WORD DEMOCRACY MERITS DEMERITS CONCLUSION “In a democracy the poor will have more power than the rich, because ther are more of them, and will of the majority is supreme” Aristotle Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically.